Gadi Eisenkot sat in the room where Israel's war was run while his own son was killed fighting it. Now the opposition has made him its candidate for prime minister — and handed him an arithmetic problem nobody has solved.
On December 7, 2023, Master Sergeant Gal Eisenkot, 25, was killed in Jabalia, in northern Gaza. His father was not at home waiting for the knock on the door. Gadi Eisenkot, a former chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, was sitting inside Israel's war cabinet — a non-voting observer, but in the room — while the army he once commanded fought the war that killed his son. Gal's cousin Maor was killed in Gaza the following day. A second nephew fell in November 2024. Eisenkot buried his son and went back to the cabinet table.
That is the man Israel's opposition has chosen. On October 27, 2026, Israeli voters produced a Knesset with no majority: the final certified results give Benjamin Netanyahu's bloc 53 seats, the opposition bloc 48, and the Arab parties 19, in a parliament where 61 govern. This week, President Isaac Herzog opened consultations at his residence. On Wednesday, Ra'am announced it will recommend Eisenkot, taking his declared endorsements to 56 against Netanyahu's 46, with the Joint List still uncommitted and 67 within reach if it follows. Herzog must hand someone the mandate by November 11. Every major outlet in Israel expects it to be Eisenkot: 28 days, plus a possible 14, to build a government.
Here is the problem, and it is not a secret — his own partners state it in public. Sixty-seven recommendations are not sixty-one votes. The Joint List is expected to recommend him and has said, in terms, that it will not join his government: its lawmaker Yusuf Jabareen told the Guardian, "As long as the occupation of our people in the West Bank continues, we cannot be part of a government." The only arithmetic yet identified runs through a minority government resting on Arab parties' support from outside — and Avigdor Liberman, whose Yisrael Beytenu holds seven of Eisenkot's own 48 seats, has ruled out exactly that: "I was also clear on the topic of a minority government. It won't happen." Liberman rules out Netanyahu too — "The world will turn upside down before I sit with Netanyahu" — and Eisenkot has closed the same door from his side, telling 103FM on October 21 that he will not serve under Netanyahu, "not even in a rotation arrangement — I resign an hour later." So the front-runner for the mandate is a man whose endorsements point to a government his own bloc has promised not to build. That is the frame. What follows is the record he would bring into the room if he somehow builds it.
Eisenkot is not a politician who once wore a uniform; he is a general who became a politician late and reluctantly. He served as the IDF's 21st chief of staff from February 2015 to January 2019 — the first Mizrahi Jew to hold the post. As chief of staff he escalated what Israel calls the "campaign between the wars": hundreds of strikes against Iranian entrenchment in Syria, conducted for years without acknowledgment. On leaving the post in January 2019, he said the quiet part out loud: "We struck thousands of targets without claiming responsibility or asking for credit." In December 2018 he launched Operation Northern Shield to expose and destroy Hezbollah's cross-border tunnels. And he commanded the army through the 2018 Gaza border protests, when soldiers under his command used live fire against demonstrators at the fence.
His most quoted words predate all of it. In October 2008, as head of Northern Command, Eisenkot laid out what became known as the Dahiya doctrine, named for the Beirut quarter Israel flattened in 2006. He told Yedioth Ahronoth: "What happened in the Dahieh quarter of Beirut in 2006 will happen in every village from which shots will be fired in fighting with Israel. We will wield disproportionate power and cause immense damage and destruction. From our perspective, these are military bases. This isn't a suggestion. It's a plan that has already been authorized." Two years later he defended the doctrine as "a moral pattern." No retraction has ever been found. The man now seeking to lead Israel's government is on the record, in his own words, as the author of a doctrine of disproportionate destruction — and he has never taken a word of it back.
His war-cabinet chapter needs precision, because both his admirers and his enemies blur it. Eisenkot joined the war cabinet on October 12, 2023, as an observer — he attended, he argued, he did not vote. On October 11, he and Benny Gantz had blocked a proposed pre-emptive strike on Hezbollah that they believed would have been a catastrophic error; asked later whether their presence prevented a bad decision, Eisenkot answered: "Unequivocally." By January 2024 he was saying on camera, on the Uvda program, what no one else in that room would say: "Whoever speaks of absolute defeat is not speaking the truth," and that the hostages could not "be returned alive, in the near term, without a deal." On June 9, 2024, he and Gantz resigned. His resignation letter charges that the cabinet "did not make the decisive decisions required to achieve the goals of the war." He left, in other words, accusing Netanyahu of running a war without a strategy — a charge he has repeated ever since.
Precision matters most on the killings, because the timeline is routinely falsified by implication. During Eisenkot's entire tenure in the war cabinet, exactly one major assassination is documented: Saleh al-Arouri, killed in Beirut on January 2, 2024 — and no personal statement by Eisenkot about it has been found. The famous sequence came after he walked out: Mohammed Deif and Fuad Shukr in July 2024, Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran on July 31, the exploding pagers that September, Hassan Nasrallah on September 27, Yahya Sinwar on October 16 — every one of them after June 9, 2024, when Eisenkot was a private citizen building a political career. Anyone who credits him with those killings, or blames him for them, is rewriting the calendar. There is exactly one named man Eisenkot has personally discussed killing: Qassem Soleimani. Recounting a May 2018 battle day in a 2022 interview, he said of the Iranian Quds Force commander: "We had approval to take him down if we could pinpoint his location. We did not have him in our sights." Soleimani lived until the Americans killed him in 2020. The sentence tells you the doctrine, though: the approval existed; only the shot was missing.
On Palestine, his record is not ambiguous, and it is not moderate — it is a ceiling stated in advance. He has said flatly: "Two states for two peoples is a mistake." In August 2026 he promised: "No Palestinian state will be established under the government we form." The maximum he offers, per the Times of Israel on October 6, 2026, is "autonomy or a state-minus." His security formula, in his own words: "Between the Jordan River and the Sea, Israel must have overriding security responsibility." On Hamas he is absolute, and he dates his own commitment: "I raised my hand in favor of the destruction of Hamas's military and governmental power," with a pledge, made October 15, 2026, to accomplish it within eighteen months. He opposes West Bank annexation — not on Palestinian rights, but on arithmetic, warning that absorbing another 2.8 million Palestinians would endanger "the Zionist enterprise." He has called settler violence "Jewish terrorism." And then there are the two silences, which belong in the record precisely because they are silences: across the entire documented file, no verbatim Eisenkot position could be found on the re-settlement of Gaza, and none on Palestinian civilian casualties. The general who has an on-record answer for almost everything has said neither. A government under him would inherit both questions on day one.
On Lebanon, his positions as reported in 2025–26 — drawn from Ynet reporting summarised by the Quincy Institute, the Hebrew originals not independently opened — are an 8-kilometre security zone inside Lebanon, Hezbollah's disarmament as a precondition, and continued Israeli freedom of operation, which he has warned would be "a generational regret" to surrender. On Iran he supports destroying the nuclear, missile, and proxy programs — "that is the right thing to do. And I know how to do that" — while opposing the maximalist version: "Making regime change an objective of war is not the right thing to do." He called the 2018 American withdrawal from the nuclear deal "a strategic mistake." This is a hawk with a doctrine, not a dove with a résumé, and his record should be argued with on those terms.
His circle is small and military. Yashar's number two is Yossi Cohen, a former Shin Bet chief — not the ex-Mossad chief of the same name. His campaign manager and close adviser is Ronen Manelis, the former IDF spokesman. No cabinet assignments have been announced. His platform promises a state commission of inquiry into October 7 on day one, and mandatory military, national, or civilian service for all — including the ultra-Orthodox, with only a small Torah-study exemption — which is why the Haredi parties are not returning his calls either. His four published conditions for any coalition are a Jewish, democratic, liberal, egalitarian state; the values of the Declaration of Independence; universal service; and Hamas recognised as a terrorist organisation whose military and governing power is destroyed.
So this is the whole picture, and none of it requires exaggeration. A general who authored a doctrine of disproportionate force and never retracted it. A war-cabinet observer who told the public the war's stated goal was a lie while his son was buried by that war. A candidate whose maximum offer to Palestinians is a state-minus under permanent Israeli security control, who promises Hamas's destruction on an eighteen-month clock, and who has no recorded words at all for Gaza's re-settlement or its dead civilians. And a man holding the strongest endorsement count in the country for a government his own allies have ruled out in advance. If he solves the sum, that record is what takes office. If he doesn't, Israel goes back to the voters with the same record waiting. Either way, the record is the record — and it starts with a father in a war room, burying his son, and going back to work.
Sources: President of Israel / Central Elections Committee certified results (Oct 30, 2026) and final seat count; Ynet recommendation tally (Nov 4, 2026); All Israel News, Algemeiner and Walaw on the four coalition conditions; 103FM interview (Oct 21, 2026); Guardian interview with Yusuf Jabareen; Yedioth Ahronoth (Oct 3, 2008) Dahiya doctrine interview, via Reuters; Uvda interview (Jan 2024) and Eisenkot resignation letter (Jun 9, 2024); Times of Israel (Oct 6 and Oct 15, 2026); Al-Monitor (2022) Soleimani interview; Channel 13 and CNN reporting on Eisenkot's Gaza and settler-violence positions. Full graded research file: "The Eisenkot File," The Veracity Project research notes, Nov 3, 2026.
Comments
Post a Comment